Home
Night and Day
Loading Inventory...
Barnes and Noble
Night and Day
Current price: $11.99
Barnes and Noble
Night and Day
Current price: $11.99
Loading Inventory...
Size: OS
*Product Information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, and additional information please contact Barnes and Noble
1982 will forever be known as the year that the punks got class -- or at least when
and
, rivals for the title of Britain's reigning Angry Young Man -- decided that they were not just rockers, but really songwriters in the
tradition. (
, fellow angry Brit, sat this battle out, choosing to work with
producer
instead.) Both had been genre-hopping prior to 1982, but
's
announced to the world that both were "serious songwriters," standing far apart from the clamoring punkers and silly new wavers. In retrospect, the ambitions of these two 27-year-olds (both born in August 1954, just two weeks apart) seem a little grandiose, and if
didn't live up to its masterpiece marketing campaign (stalling at number 30 on the charts without generating a hit), it has garnered a stronger reputation than
, which was a much more popular album, climbing all the way to number four on the U.S. charts, thanks to the Top Ten single
had greater success because it's sleek and bright, entirely more accessible than the dense, occasionally unwieldy darkness of
. Plus,
plays up the comparisons to classic
songwriting by lifting his album title from
, dividing the record into a "night" and "day" side, and then topping it off with a neat line drawing of him at his piano in a New York apartment on the cover. All of these classy trappings are apparent on the surface, which is the problem with the record: it's all stylized, with the feel eclipsing the writing, which is kind of ironic considering that
so clearly strives to be a sophisticated cosmopolitan songwriter here. He gets the cosmopolitan, big-city feel down pat; although the record never delivers on the "night" and "day" split, with the latter side feeling every bit as nocturnal as the former, his blend of percolating
rhythms, jazzy horns and pianos, stylish synths, and splashy
melodies uncannily feel like a bustling, glitzy evening in the big city. On that front,
is a success, since it creates a mood and sustains it very well. Where it lets down is the substance of the songs. At a mere nine tracks, it's a brief album even by 1982 standards, and it seems even shorter because about half the numbers are more about sound than song.
gets by on its form, not what it says, while
are swinging
-flavored jams that disappear into the air.
is a novelty pastiche that's slightly off-key, but nowhere near as irritating as
where
mimics
's hyper-manic vocal mannerisms. These all fit the concept of the LP and they're engaging on record, but they're slight, especially given
's overarching ambition -- and their flimsiness is brought into sharp relief by the remaining four songs, which are among
's very best. There is, of course, the breakthrough hit
which pulsates anticipatory excitement, but the aching
is just as good, as is the haunting
and the album opener,
a vibrant, multi-colored song that perfectly sets up the sonic and lyrical themes of the album. If all of
played at this level, it would be the self-styled masterpiece
intended it to be. Instead, it is a very good record that delivers some nice, stylish pleasures; but its shortcomings reveal precisely how difficult it is to follow in the tradition of
. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine