Home
On Our Own Terms: Development and Indigeneity Cold War Guatemala
Loading Inventory...
Barnes and Noble
On Our Own Terms: Development and Indigeneity Cold War Guatemala
Current price: $99.00
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/635ef/635ef3bafdd5c70e95840dc47d89a150d4c941b2" alt="On Our Own Terms: Development and Indigeneity Cold War Guatemala"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/635ef/635ef3bafdd5c70e95840dc47d89a150d4c941b2" alt="On Our Own Terms: Development and Indigeneity Cold War Guatemala"
Barnes and Noble
On Our Own Terms: Development and Indigeneity Cold War Guatemala
Current price: $99.00
Loading Inventory...
Size: Hardcover
*Product Information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, and additional information please contact Barnes and Noble
During the Cold War, U.S. intervention in Latin American politics, economics, and society grew in scope and complexity, with diplomatic legacies evident in today's hemispheric policies. Development became a key form of intervention as government officials and experts from the United States and Latin America believed that development could foster hemispheric solidarity and security. In parts of Latin America, its implementation was especially intricate because recipients of these programs were diverse Indigenous peoples with their own politics, economics, and cultures. Contrary to project planners' expectations, Indigenous beneficiaries were not passive recipients but actively engaged with development interventions and, in the process, redefined racialized ideas about Indigeneity.Sarah Foss illustrates how this process transpired in Cold War Guatemala, spanning democratic revolution, military coups, and genocidal civil war. Drawing on previously unused sources such as oral histories, anthropologists' field notes, military records, municipal and personal archives, and a private photograph collection, Foss analyzes the uses and consequences of development and its relationship to ideas about race from multiple perspectives, emphasizing its historical significance as a form of intervention during the Cold War.