Home
Plato's Euthyphro and the Earlier Theory of Forms (RLE: Plato): A Re-Interpretation Republic
Loading Inventory...
Barnes and Noble
Plato's Euthyphro and the Earlier Theory of Forms (RLE: Plato): A Re-Interpretation Republic
Current price: $160.00
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f3e/51f3ee48007628f22b4126c0881f50dd1df5f249" alt="Plato's Euthyphro and the Earlier Theory of Forms (RLE: Plato): A Re-Interpretation Republic"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f3e/51f3ee48007628f22b4126c0881f50dd1df5f249" alt="Plato's Euthyphro and the Earlier Theory of Forms (RLE: Plato): A Re-Interpretation Republic"
Barnes and Noble
Plato's Euthyphro and the Earlier Theory of Forms (RLE: Plato): A Re-Interpretation Republic
Current price: $160.00
Loading Inventory...
Size: Hardcover
*Product Information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, and additional information please contact Barnes and Noble
Plato’s
Euthyphro
is important because it gives an excellent example of Socratic dialogue in operation and of the connection of that dialectic with Plato’s earlier theory of Forms. Professor Allen’s edition of the dialogue provides a translation with interspersed commentary, aimed both at helping the reader who does not have Greek and also elucidating the discussion of the earlier Theory of Forms which follows. The author argues that there is a theory of Forms in the
and in other early Platonic dialogues and that this theory is the foundation of Socratic dialogue. However, he maintains that the theory in the early dialogues is a realist theory of universals and this theory is not to be identified with the theory of Forms found in the Phaedo, Republic, and other middle dialogues, since it differs on the issues of ontological status.
Euthyphro
is important because it gives an excellent example of Socratic dialogue in operation and of the connection of that dialectic with Plato’s earlier theory of Forms. Professor Allen’s edition of the dialogue provides a translation with interspersed commentary, aimed both at helping the reader who does not have Greek and also elucidating the discussion of the earlier Theory of Forms which follows. The author argues that there is a theory of Forms in the
and in other early Platonic dialogues and that this theory is the foundation of Socratic dialogue. However, he maintains that the theory in the early dialogues is a realist theory of universals and this theory is not to be identified with the theory of Forms found in the Phaedo, Republic, and other middle dialogues, since it differs on the issues of ontological status.